Neutrinovoltaic technology: an integrated approach to energy generation

To ensure reliable autonomous power generation, fuel-free technologies must be based on engineering solutions that take into account realistic physical principles, operational stability, component durability, and adaptability to various operating conditions. Let's consider the key aspects and examples of such technologies.

Reliability criteria for fuel-free power generation

• Physical validity of the operating principle. The technology must be based on proven scientific laws and phenomena, excluding violations of the fundamental laws of thermodynamics (for example, the impossibility of achieving efficiency greater than 100% in a closed system).

• Output power stability. The system must provide a constant power supply regardless of external conditions (weather, time of day, etc.), unless this conflicts with its operating principle.

• Component durability. Materials and structural elements must withstand long-term loads, temperature fluctuations, mechanical stress, and other operational factors.

• Autonomy and minimal maintenance. For practical use, it is important that the system operate without constant human intervention and frequent repairs.

• Protection from external influences. The design must be resistant to dust, moisture, extreme temperatures, and other adverse conditions.

• Scalability. The technology can be adapted for use in both small and large power systems.

Neutrinovoltaic technology is an example of fuel-free technologies with engineering solutions.

It uses graphene and doped silicon to convert the energy of invisible particles (neutrinos, electromagnetic radiation, and the thermal motion of atoms) into electric current.

Engineering Solutions:

• A multilayer nanomaterial made of alternating layers of graphene and silicon increases the active surface area and energy production.

• The modular design (Neutrino Power Cube) allows for scalability—from compact household generators to large-scale building installations.

• The technology is independent of weather conditions and operates 24/7.

The Neutrino Power Cube can be viewed as an example of decentralization in the energy sector through the lens of a closed-loop engineering approach, if we analyze its technical characteristics and operating principles rather than ideological pronouncements. Decentralization in the energy sector implies a transition from large centralized systems to local, autonomous energy sources, which increases the flexibility, reliability, and availability of energy supply. A closed engineering cycle in this context means complete autonomy of the system, minimization of external influences and self-sufficiency in energy generation.

One of the Neutrino Power Cube's skin variations

Neutrinovoltaic technology: an integrated approach to energy generation

Neutrinovoltaic technology is a multi-channel mechanism for converting dissipated energy—it utilizes not one, but a combination of physically confirmed sources of low-intensity interactions. Below is an analysis of each component and a rationale for their combined effectiveness.

Energy sources: physical justification

1. Solar and Atmospheric Neutrinos

• Nature of the Flux. Neutrinos are produced in solar thermonuclear reactions, atmospheric processes (pion and muon decays), as well as in supernovae and other astrophysical sources.

• Flux Density. For solar neutrinos, it is approximately 6.5 x 10^10 neutrinos/cm^2 at the Earth's surface.

• Energy Transfer Mechanism. Coherent elastic scattering of neutrinos by nuclei has been experimentally confirmed (CeνNS, COHERENT experiment, 2017). In this case, the nucleus receives a recoil momentum with an energy of E_r ⁓ eV-keV (depending on the mass of the nucleus and the neutrino energy).

• Key Aspect. Although the energy of a single interaction is small, the colossal flux area provides an integral effect.

2. Cosmic Muons

• Origin. They are generated in the upper atmosphere by interactions between cosmic rays and atomic nuclei.

• Intensity: At sea level, approximately 1 muon/cm^2 min.

• Energy contribution. Muons lose energy through ionization of matter (specific losses of 2 MeV cm^2/g). In condensed matter, this creates secondary electrons and phonons, which can be converted into current.

• Flux stability. Muon intensity varies little over time (unlike, for example, solar flux).

3. Surrounding electromagnetic fields

• Sources. Natural (ionospheric resonances, atmospheric discharges) and man-made (power transmission networks, electronics) fields.

• Frequency range. From kHz (atmospheric noise) to GHz (radio emission).

• Conversion. In conducting nanomaterials (graphene, doped silicon), alternating fields induce displacement currents and eddy currents, which can be collected through resonant structures.

4. Thermal vibrations of the crystal lattice

• Physical basis. At T>0 K, atoms oscillate with an amplitude depending on on temperature and the strength of interatomic bonds.

• Phonon energy. For typical materials at room temperature, it is on the order of K_{B}T≈25 meV.

• Use. In heterostructures (graphene/silicon), thermal phonons can cause piezoelectric, triboelectric, flexoelectric, and thermoelectric effects, complementing other generation channels.

Integrating Channels into the Neutrino Power Cube

The device does not rely on a single dominant source, but conservatively sums the contributions of all four mechanisms:

1. Multilayer nanomaterials (graphene and doped silicon) provide:

• Large interaction area with neutrinos and muons;

• Sensitivity to electromagnetic fields due to the conductivity of graphene;

• Piezoelectric response to phonon modes.

2. Resonant structures in the material enhance the response to certain frequencies of electromagnetic fields.

3. Heteroboundaries between the graphene and silicon layers create potential barriers for the separation of charges generated by all types of interactions.

4. Thermal stabilization minimizes losses from self-heating, maintaining efficiency at room temperature.

Why it's not a "perpetual motion machine"

The technology does not violate the laws of thermodynamics:

• Energy comes from external sources (space, atmosphere, thermal motion).

• Efficiency is limited by losses due to dissipation, ohmic resistance, etc.

• Output power is proportional to the active zone area and the intensity of external fluxes.

Critical remarks and verification methods

1. Energy scale. Single interactions produce eV-keV, but the integral effect requires:

• Ultra-dense packing of active layers;

• Minimization of parasitic losses.

2. Independent verification. The following was performed:

• Output current measurements in shielded chambers (to eliminate electromagnetic interference).

3. Required:

• Comparison of generation at different cosmic ray intensities (e.g., at different altitudes).

• Analysis of the isotopic composition of materials after long-term operation (to confirm CEνNS).

4. Scaling. Current prototypes (e.g., Neutrino Power Cube) generate 5-6 kW of power. More efficient use requires:

• Increasing the active layer area.

• Reducing the cost of graphene.

Conclusion

Neutrinovoltaic technology relies on a set of physically confirmed phenomena, rather than hypothetical processes. Its potential is determined by:

• The ability to integrate heterogeneous energy sources;

• The use of nanostructured materials to amplify weak signals;

• A conservative approach to converting dissipated energy.

Authors: Holger Thorsten Schubart, L.K. Rumyantsev

Read the original article